TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu UH-X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFujitsu UH-X  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB2F5
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230127
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 19:32
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 39.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 251
75% 147 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 507
55% 437 Pts
64-Core 608
38% 608 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 53.5%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1E26 009C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 15.7
13% 15.9 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 12.9
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 12.8%
 Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B07 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 696 785 719 439 194 207 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 754
Write 858
Mixed 651
SusWrite 507
156% 692 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 34.8
111% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 308
238% 331 MB/s
Poor: 88% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 235%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
372GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 83 83 82 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 78.4
Mixed 54
SusWrite 81.4
95% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 34.4%
 Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPMBLHR-NEE 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 57
MC Mixed 50.4
143% 50 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 18.6
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 206
19% 206 ns
Poor: 98% ↑
This bench: 125%
 Great: 130%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 10 0 13.3" 1280 720 SHP156C LQ133M1JW62A
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical UH-X Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu UH-X

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples21x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples19x
Core i5-1235UIntelBench 60%, 8,532 samples8x
GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples40x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples12x
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples1x
SSD
PC SN530 SDBQNPZ-512G-1016 512GBWDCBench 157%, 75 samples15x
MZVLQ1T0HALB-00007 1TBSamsungBench 142%, 38 samples12x
MZVLQ512HALU-00007 512GBSamsungBench 129%, 133 samples11x
RAM
8x2GBMicronBench 117%, 968 samples20x
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GBSamsungBench 117%, 1,024 samples17x
H9HCNNNCPMBLHR-NEE 8x2GBHynixBench 114%, 25 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback