Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime325.8 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 11:26
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 610
63% 508 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 115
Parallax 129
169% 150 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 96
Splatting 117
106% 133 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 138%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 618 617 600 600 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,158
Write 2031
Mixed 1,488
SusWrite 652
354% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 62.3
200% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 739
534% 696 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 219%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
6GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 213
Mixed 320
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 39.3
156% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 335
248% 330 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
116GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 376 459 464 470 468 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 74.6
Write 48.8
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 382
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 51.7
4K Mixed 5.8
40% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 160
127% 184 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 206 207 205 206 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 164
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 205
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 116%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FAD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 23.8" 1280 720 DELA0C0 DELL P2415Q
Typical GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 1,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 5 - $167

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $757
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback