HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20151116
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '24 at 09:05
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-8350B R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
XU1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 98.9
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 47.8
50% 65.2 Pts
4-Core 51.4
8-Core 47.9
7% 49.7 Pts
64-Core 54.5
3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 805A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.65% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 6.9
2% 4.7 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 6.8
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.65%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wei Disk 128gb SSD 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R632D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 172 164 137 97 152 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.6% Poor
Read 132
Write 151
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 140
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 5.4
20% 9.2 MB/s
DQ Read 59.7
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 112
84% 108 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
179GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 37 36 39 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 152
Write 32.6
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 36.5
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 8GB
1333, 1066, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 209
19% 209 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 21% 38 62 18 60 21.5" 1920 1009 SAM0D1B S22F350
Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback