TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505VA_F1505VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505VA_F1505VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1505VA
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 20:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 45.4
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 180
56% 106 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 498
48% 394 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 49.7%
 Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1803) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 20
Parallax 18.4
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 17.3
Gravity 23
Splatting 14.6
15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 14%
 Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74114000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1043 816 839 851 593 1185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1110
Write 1,028
Mixed 969
SusWrite 888
225% 999 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 29.3
113% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 266
172% 202 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑
This bench: 141%
 Great: 523%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Apacer D23.27221M.001 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 25
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 66%
 Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1440 810 SDC4180
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505VA_F1505VA Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1505VA_F1505VA

CPU
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples3x
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples2x
Core i5-1335UIntelBench 76%, 1,345 samples1x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples5x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 6,283 samples1x
SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 243%, 3,424 samples4x
INTEL SSDPEKNW010T8 1TBNvmeBench 168%, 3,285 samples1x
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1102 1TBNvmeBench 319%, 208 samples1x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GBMicronBench 72%, 319 samples3x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Apacer D23.27221M.001 16GBMicronBench 73%, 24 samples2x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GBSamsungBench 71%, 117 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback