Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 16:49
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$120
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 324
103% 193 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 949
89% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,199
74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Lighting 242
Reflection 221
Parallax 213
197% 225 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 160
Splatting 142
136% 170 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 161%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P5 500GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2571 2183 663 671 680 669 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 3,284
Write 3,026
Mixed 2,149
SusWrite 1,239
542% 2,425 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 76.5
248% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,062
DQ Write 747
DQ Mixed 864
656% 891 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 325%
Great: 431%
Nvme Lexar SSD NM710 1TB
466GB free
Firmware: 8212 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3169 3128 3102 2167 1061 664 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 3,217
Write 3,035
Mixed 2,131
SusWrite 2,215
595% 2,650 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 72
243% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 781
DQ Mixed 910
693% 945 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 382%
Great: 530%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
650GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 143 144 144 143 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 168
Write 121
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 142
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 185 186 187 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 148
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 184
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
WD Game Drive 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 115 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 93.3
Write 110
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 114
134% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
267% 3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GTZR Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GTZRX Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GTZR Skill Intl F4-3600C18-8GTZRX 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 39.6
119% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 46.7
SC Mixed 31.1
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 75 34.1" 2560 1080 GSM7757 LG HDR WFHD
Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $604
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback