Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 14:35
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 111
2-Core 210
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 642
64% 523 Pts
64-Core 859
53% 859 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 78.1
0% 44.3 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 43.8
44% 54.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 15%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 254 413 446 456 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 372
Write 434
Mixed 354
SusWrite 303
83% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 35
128% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 169
159% 244 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 102%
INTENSO 256GB
193GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 433 421 441 446 443 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 450
Mixed 439
SusWrite 438
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 33.5
142% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 58.9
111% 219 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
233GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 192 80 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 192
Mixed 441
SusWrite 164
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 48.8
161% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 128%
Intenso External USB 3.0 500GB
40GB free
Firmware: 5438
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 49 34 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 26.9
Write 51.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 53.4
29% 40 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2800C17-8GIS F4-3000C16-8GISB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 23.6
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 216 59 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0496 R271
Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback