Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 11:12
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 596
60% 487 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.5% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 59.3
48% 59.4 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 59.7
49% 59.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
272GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 986 943 927 906 848 833 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,088
Write 951
Mixed 946
SusWrite 907
219% 973 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 49
157% 51 MB/s
DQ Read 612
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 496
379% 517 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 172%
Great: 435%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
146GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1577 867 557 556 559 557 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 1,450
Write 1346
Mixed 682
SusWrite 779
238% 1,064 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 36.1
123% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 535
387% 506 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 166%
Great: 254%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 141 142 141 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 161
Write 164
Mixed 112
SusWrite 140
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
49GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 156 154 155 156 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 90
Write 72
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 155
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 103%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB
0GB free, PID 0577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38
Write 33.8
Mixed 32.5
44% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.8% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 19.8
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 34.1" 1280 720 GSM774B LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback