Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 4 months ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 21:34
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 552
56% 456 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 93.1
Reflection 111
Parallax 97.8
76% 101 fps
MRender 88.6
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 98.8
78% 94.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 412 379 475 615 506 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 1,128
Write 980
Mixed 966
SusWrite 522
202% 899 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 54.5
176% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 548
DQ Mixed 536
410% 556 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 157%
Great: 435%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
101GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 837 384 335 329 326 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,656
Write 1,457
Mixed 712
SusWrite 422
236% 1,062 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 41.9
139% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 536
398% 533 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 159%
Great: 254%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
89GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 116 115 98 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 157
Write 151
Mixed 97
SusWrite 110
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
527GB free
Firmware: 0911
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 106 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 160
Write 135
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 106
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 103%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB
123GB free, PID 0577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 63.8
Write 23.5
Mixed 34
SusWrite 35.7
48% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
72% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 19.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 18
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,091
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback