Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200428
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '24 at 09:48
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	UZB-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 188 67% 118 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 362 49% 363 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 21 17% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 17.2 18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 160 128 124 135 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 478 Write 439 Mixed 332 SusWrite 127 77% 344 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 25.1 119% 45.9 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 116 109% 164 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 99%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB 10,530 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 327GB free Firmware: V4.1.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 404 407 413 414 410 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 425 Write 469 Mixed 426 SusWrite 415 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 34.6 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 41.5 147% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 295 216% 281 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 313%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CB8GU2666.C8JT 2x8GB 284 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 34.1 MC Mixed 31.4 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 97.2 41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	21.5"	1280 720	OOO0000 MA2222W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,893 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	284x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	225x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16