Acer Aspire AV15-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire AV15-51  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jade_TL
Memory0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211108
Uptime91.7 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 07:28
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 59.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 259
80% 151 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 652
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 158D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 18.6
Reflection 20.9
Parallax 24.1
15% 21.2 fps
MRender 19.3
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 12.1
12% 15.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GB
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21113000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 387 303 300 296 305 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,525
Write 1,417
Mixed 1,417
SusWrite 373
265% 1,183 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 68.6
226% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 651
DQ Mixed 848
621% 817 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 190%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 0x 8GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.4% Good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19.2
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 12.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 10 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO0C9C
Typical Aspire AV15-51 Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire AV15-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback