PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B98 |
Motherboard | MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) (all builds) |
Memory | 17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191225 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '24 at 03:19 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
63.2%
Good
|
71% 128 Pts
|
48% 375 Pts
|
29% 464 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
145%
Outstanding
|
160% 195 fps
|
148% 192 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 407 217 171 124 153 MB/s
|
141%
Outstanding
|
180% 809 MB/s
|
188% 65.7 MB/s
|
181% 365 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
264GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 364 358 86 82 81 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
57% 255 MB/s
|
74% 27.1 MB/s
|
222% 294 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
326GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 236 138 135 119 120 MB/s
|
66.4%
Good
|
58% 257 MB/s
|
101% 37.5 MB/s
|
202% 272 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 286 281 282 292 289 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
62% 276 MB/s
|
81% 28.2 MB/s
|
248% 327 MB/s
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 46 | 24 | 60 | 27" | 1280 720 | AUS27AF VG278 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 8,267x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 7,989x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 3,879x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples | 2,469x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $271Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 2,376x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 2,190x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 106% - Outstanding | Total price: $834 |