MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191225
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 14 '24 at 03:19
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 66.8
1-Core 110
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 420
48% 375 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 196
Reflection 177
Parallax 211
160% 195 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 164
Splatting 115
148% 192 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 145%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 407 217 171 124 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,223
Write 977
Mixed 850
SusWrite 188
180% 809 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 51.7
188% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 509
DQ Write 494
DQ Mixed 91.3
181% 365 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 141%
Great: 242%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
264GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 364 358 86 82 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 322
Write 282
Mixed 192
SusWrite 223
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 23.1
74% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 298
222% 294 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 121%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
326GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 236 138 135 119 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 292
Write 285
Mixed 266
SusWrite 186
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 26.9
101% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 262
202% 272 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 128%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 286 281 282 292 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 318
Write 273
Mixed 214
SusWrite 298
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 26.9
81% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 335
248% 327 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 12.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 24 60 27" 1280 720 AUS27AF VG278
Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback