Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory43.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 22:28
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 888
91% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,027
64% 1,027 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Dell(1028 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2047 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 120
Parallax 106
84% 110 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 102
Splatting 106
84% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 PRO XT 1TB
827GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2296 2267 2284 2323 2143 1848 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 1,788
Write 2,079
Mixed 1,934
SusWrite 2,194
453% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 64.2
208% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,175
DQ Write 805
DQ Mixed 1,003
745% 994 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 314%
Great: 507%
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: HP2818E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 431 441 461 457 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 484
Write 468
Mixed 377
SusWrite 444
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 12.7
90% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 16.1
76% 170 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR KF3600C18D4/16GX HP37D4U1S8MR-8XR 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 37.5
122% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 47.6
SC Mixed 35.6
109% 38.2 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 118%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 31.5" 1280 720 AOC3202 32G2WG3
Typical TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING A520M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback