QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory31.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.4 GB free of 31.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 18:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 130
2-Core 270
85% 159 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 839
79% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,046
65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
PowerColor(148C 2418) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 142
Parallax 235
97% 165 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 125
Splatting 190
147% 180 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 500GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 310 299 298 300 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 457
Write 405
Mixed 409
SusWrite 296
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 23.3
77% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 81
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 78.3
62% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15808 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 40.5
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 38.4
86% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 84.6" 1280 720 VES3700 43UHD_LCD_TV
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback