QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory31.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory24.9 GB free of 31.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 18:18
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 76.8
1-Core 135
2-Core 267
86% 160 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 836
79% 654 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
PowerColor(148C 2418) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 141
Parallax 242
95% 167 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 122
Splatting 186
145% 177 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 116%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 500GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 298 299 299 252 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 456
Write 403
Mixed 392
SusWrite 285
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 24.4
80% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 83.4
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 84.4
66% 89.6 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15808 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.1
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 25.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 38.5
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 0 84.6" 1280 720 VES3700 43UHD_LCD_TV
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback