Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime28.2 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 14:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 172
2-Core 336
108% 200 Pts
4-Core 610
8-Core 866
93% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,104
68% 1,104 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8850) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 178
Parallax 166
149% 175 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 136
Splatting 118
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1688 1698 1437 951 467 534 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 1,680
Write 1,749
Mixed 1,291
SusWrite 1,129
329% 1,462 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 92.2
318% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 765
DQ Write 1,024
DQ Mixed 353
418% 714 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 274%
Great: 277%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 153 153 159 164 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 48.6
Write 73.1
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 157
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59%
Great: 90%
ST925031 5AS 250GB
160GB free, PID 0470
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 39.9
51% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 34.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 35.6
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 LEN61ED LEN T27q-20
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback