HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 13:34
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 64
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 596
64% 508 Pts
64-Core 835
52% 835 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 71%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6650-XT
XFX(1EAE 6502) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 141
Parallax 229
94% 162 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 122
Splatting 187
145% 178 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 752
Write 203
Mixed 192
82% 382 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 29.3
115% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 476
350% 462 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$135
577GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 363 366 398 443 452 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 386
Write 388
Mixed 358
SusWrite 399
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 39.3
120% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 279
206% 272 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V1D4LF16GB1G81G82666 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 DELD0F4 DELL S3220DGF
Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback