HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 13:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 336
46% 341 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Zotac(19DA 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 168
Parallax 112
93% 132 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 100
Splatting 93.3
89% 111 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 367 407 434 432 433 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 327
Write 363
Mixed 308
SusWrite 382
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 42.6
136% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 156
163% 269 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 125%
Seagate ST3000NM0053 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 161 165 166 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 154
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 161
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
223% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KY7N41-MIE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.4% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 22.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.9" 1920 1080 SAM707D LF24T35
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback