Lenovo 81MU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81MU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 05:02
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 5405U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 63
2-Core 114
50% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 159
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 3F1A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.3
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 5.1
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Eaget Device 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 416 409 512 337 454 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,120
Write 37.3
Mixed 444
SusWrite 415
110% 504 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 9.8
80% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 53.5
DQ Mixed 331
213% 256 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
406GB free
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 107 106 107 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 101
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 105
61% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron CODRAM 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 8.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 24 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE075A
Typical 81MU Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81MU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback