Intel X99

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X99  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '24 at 11:12
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 177
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 716
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,577
98% 1,577 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Sapphire(1DA2 E426) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.1% Very good
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 109
Parallax 147
80% 118 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 72
71% 88.8 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 91%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KPART512GBC2DVS 512GB
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW000001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1018 525 536 546 544 538 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,553
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,096
SusWrite 618
280% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 45
144% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 400
DQ Mixed 614
440% 571 MB/s
Poor: 169%
This bench: 169%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 22.7
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.7
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 75" 1280 720 SNY7105 SONY TV *30
Typical X99 Builds (Compare 2,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback