LG P430-K.BE44P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLG P430-K.BE44P1  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121008
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 19:57
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 46.1
32% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 59.7
8-Core 62
8% 60.8 Pts
64-Core 63.5
4% 63.5 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Device(1854 3001) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.76%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 020KST17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 138 88 87 60 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 308
Write 275
Mixed 217
SusWrite 109
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 3.9
33% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 83.2
68% 97.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-042.A00G SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 10.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 44 28 60 14" 1280 720 LGD02F9
Typical P430-K.BE44P1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: LG P430-K.BE44P1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback