Notebook NJx0PU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemNotebook NJx0PU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NJx0PU
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 11:36
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 48.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 274
84% 161 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 586
62% 494 Pts
64-Core 752
46% 752 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8885) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 13.3
6% 11.3 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 13.9
13% 15.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX600-1K0-80 1TB
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2442 2412 1185 1143 1264 1223 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 1,837
Write 3,589
Mixed 2333
SusWrite 1,612
532% 2,343 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 89.5
307% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,134
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 755
595% 839 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 306%
Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK32S432G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1775
Typical NJx0PU Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook NJx0PU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback