Notebook NJx0PU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemNotebook NJx0PU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NJx0PU
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 13:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 280
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 604
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 799
49% 799 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 8885) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3889
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.3
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 20.4
14% 19.3 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 16.4
16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-PX600-1K0-80 1TB
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3210 2089 1064 1231 1264 1265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2027
Write 4255
Mixed 2,404
SusWrite 1,687
589% 2,593 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 96.1
318% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,184
DQ Write 698
DQ Mixed 923
692% 935 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 325%
Great: 407%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W-SKIKK32S432G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1775
Typical NJx0PU Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook NJx0PU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback