Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory35.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230515
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 18:10
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 259
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 622
64% 515 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 160C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3060 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 155
Parallax 128
105% 138 fps
MRender 147
Gravity 109
Splatting 109
98% 122 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 102%
Great: 127%
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 160C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 30.1
20% 27.9 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 35.8
Splatting 21.6
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,924
Write 1,487
Mixed 1,378
354% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 76.2
244% 83.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1083
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 881
618% 795 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 313%
Nvme CT2000P 2TB
465GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1114 1245 1278 1273 1312 949 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 407
Mixed 251
SusWrite 1,195
117% 509 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 5.6
60% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 506
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 594
403% 493 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 117%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB2GS6AMR6N-XN Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.M16FF 47GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 25.3
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 17.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 217 59 60 23.8" 1920 1017 AOC2402 24G2W1G5
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR Builds (Compare 2,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback