Asus Z97-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-C  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 15:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 573
58% 473 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M5000
HP(103C 1152) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.99
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 103
Parallax 64.5
48% 75.2 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 65.2
54% 65.4 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR313 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 572 607 508 558 469 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 695
Write 631
Mixed 637
SusWrite 522
140% 621 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 63.2
205% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 844
605% 776 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 157%
Great: 332%
HPT DISK 0_0 300GB
156GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 159 161 166 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 161
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 160
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.6
297% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 100%
HPT DISK 0_1 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 161 159 160 168 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 161
Write 165
Mixed 59
SusWrite 158
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 16.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM1045 S27R65
Typical Z97-C Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-C - $256

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $889
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback