Monster TULPAR T5 V9.1

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 3 months ago.

System	Monster TULPAR T5 V9.1 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T5 V9.1
Memory	60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '24 at 05:18
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 96.3 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 512 54% 430 Pts	64-Core 477 30% 477 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 6A01) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	4.43% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 6.2 4% 6.13 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 0.3 4% 6.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.43% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKHW240A4 240GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC31 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 193 182 231 184 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 367 Write 244 Mixed 262 SusWrite 196 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 33.8 120% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 156 144% 223 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 130 126 134 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 125 Mixed 28 SusWrite 129 75% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81% Excellent	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 27.6 84% 29.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 92%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	11	208	59	60	15.5"	1536 864	LGD046F

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T5 V9.1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V9.1

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	2x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	1x

SSD
SM2280S3G2120G 120GBKingstonBench 74%, 4,240 samples	1x
SSDSCKHW240A4 240GBIntelBench 73%, 297 samples	1x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 3,102 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 1x16GBG.SKILLBench 45%, 499 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2666 C18 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 86%, 65 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16