Asus M4N78 SE

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	68.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4N78 SE (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100414
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '24 at 22:56
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 52.4 2-Core 95.1 46% 72.6 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 248 28% 218 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% PNY(196E 1349) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.3% Good	Lighting 83.8 Reflection 86.4 Parallax 79.5 68% 83.2 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 77.8 Splatting 70.5 68% 85.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$75 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 372GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 0 213 14 0 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 146GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 92 88 91 92 87 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.9% Average	Read 184 Write 169 Mixed 176 SusWrite 87.8 35% 154 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 26.8 88% 27.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.9 DQ Write 47.3 DQ Mixed 35.1 27% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 425GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 95 91 95 96 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 113 Write 81.1 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 91.3 63% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 8.6 23% 8.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 98.4 41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	23"	1280 720	ENC2204 T2351W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N78 SE Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N78 SE

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	5x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	3x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	1x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	14x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	5x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16