Asus H110M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210204
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '24 at 11:50
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$51 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	60.6% Good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 103 2-Core 180 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 281 38% 282 Pts	64-Core 285 18% 285 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	2.98% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 4.8 Parallax 6.2 4% 5.47 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.98% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Faspeed K5-240G 240GB 248 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2272P SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 296 319 297 13 21 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 475 Write 347 Mixed 297 SusWrite 206 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 91.4 4K Mixed 10.1 117% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 13.7 58% 127 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 84%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 65GB free Firmware: 0002SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 100 100 73 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 102 Write 96.7 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 89.3 61% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HX432C16FB3/8 2x8GB 351 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57.9% Above average	MC Read 22.7 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 18.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 95 42% 95 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	28	8	60	20"	1280 720	HWP325E HP W2082a

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,997 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,131x
Core i5-6400Intel $69Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	646x
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	561x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	849x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	477x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	369x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	315x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	166x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	81x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	67x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16