Lenovo 83A2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 83A2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 11:21
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 68.1
1-Core 186
2-Core 360
106% 205 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 900
91% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3CD7) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3689
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 14.5
10% 15.3 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 1
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4512HBLU-00BL2 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1610 1992 1695 2142 1849 430 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
337% Outstanding
Read 2,001
Write 1,828
Mixed 1,186
SusWrite 1,620
372% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 90.6
278% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,668
DQ Write 1,504
DQ Mixed 1,145
980% 1,439 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 337%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1G44CB0-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 30.3
92% 32 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 24.8
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUO439D
Typical 83A2 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83A2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback