Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory73.6 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 04:29
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$993
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 823
73% 618 Pts
64-Core 2,412
149% 2,412 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
155% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 197
Parallax 227
170% 211 fps
MRender 259
Gravity 211
Splatting 156
165% 209 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 155%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 436
Mixed 299
90% 406 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 40.5
145% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 150
167% 282 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
372GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 482 147 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 486
Mixed 411
SusWrite 228
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 47
161% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 100%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
502GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 130 129 130 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 176
Write 141
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 129
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW64GX4M2E3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 79GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
32767, 8192, 32767, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 10.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 213 56 60 34.1" 1280 720 ACR0450 Acer X34
Typical ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 840 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG RAMPAGE VI EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback