bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2510 x 929 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 16:14
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 316
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 19.1.1.54734
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 18.1
14% 20.6 fps
MRender 20.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 18.7
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Windows 10-0 SSD 275GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.QTF4ZC
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 30.3
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 0" 1280 720 PRL5000 Parallels Vu
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback