Wortmann_ag 1300062;2110022

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag 1300062;2110022  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME Z270-A
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '24 at 14:16
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 65.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 191
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 257
8-Core 310
37% 283 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX550 series
XFX(1682 9550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 23.8
13% 22.6 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 18
Splatting 20
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow-x3 240GB 240GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 287 84 84 84 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 419
Write 340
Mixed 347
SusWrite 150
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 42.2
134% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 259
209% 296 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82%
Great: 114%
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: H220916a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 368 362 374 378 382 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 370
Write 390
Mixed 361
SusWrite 374
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 29
104% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 179
144% 196 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 101%
EMTEC X1 50 240GB
198GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59% Above average
Read 38.8
Write 39.2
Mixed 37
SusWrite 40.9
54% 39 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 13.3
4K Mixed 11.3
894% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 22.6
DQ Mixed 13.9
1,297% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF2X04JEEEXX-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2187 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 25
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 28 60 23" 1280 720 ENC2394 EV2316W
Typical 1300062;2110022 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag 1300062;2110022

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback