Asus B150M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B150M-C  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '24 at 23:29
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 583
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 588
36% 588 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
43.7% Average
Lighting 54
Reflection 57
Parallax 52.6
44% 54.5 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 50
Splatting 46
43% 53.6 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 411
Mixed 63.6
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 26.3
113% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 132
137% 225 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 392
Mixed 402
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 47
158% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 285
230% 326 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
54GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 285
Write 35.3
Mixed 58.9
113% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 5
854% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 5.5
611% 11 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-030.A00G 9905678-023.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 20.9
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 20.8
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 32 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM71B4 SAMSUNG
Typical B150M-C Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B150M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback