PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Biostar H61MHV3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210514 |
Uptime | 2.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 07 '24 at 19:12 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 54% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
|
50.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.2%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 4.4 24 97 4.4 4.5 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 109 181 147 70 68 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 78.C1GET.B710C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
36.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 35 | 19 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | ACR0758 EK240Y |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 20x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 16x |
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 7x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $97 |