Biostar H61MHV3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H61MHV3  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJan 07 '24 at 19:12
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 54%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 122
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 95.4
8-Core 161
16% 128 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.2% Average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 51.2
Parallax 47.3
41% 49.6 fps
MRender 57.8
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 41.2
39% 48.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 4.4 24 97 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 200
Write 172
Mixed 165
SusWrite 28
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 8.6
54% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 115
86% 113 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 109 181 147 70 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
64% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 118
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GET.B710C 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 35 19 60 23.8" 1280 720 ACR0758 EK240Y
Typical H61MHV3 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MHV3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $97
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback