MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 108% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 4 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C91
Motherboard	MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210512
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '24 at 00:55
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.25 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Memory 83 1-Core 143 2-Core 278 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 856 83% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,140 71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2836 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	125% Outstanding	Lighting 171 Reflection 182 Parallax 190 139% 181 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 180 Splatting 123 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT24B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 10,077 Write 6,316 Mixed 7,616 1,773% 8,003 MB/s	4K Read 569 4K Write 215 4K Mixed 296 1,356% 360 MB/s	DQ Read 1,596 DQ Write 1,043 DQ Mixed 1145 901% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Kingdian M280 120GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 38GB free Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 140 140 138 138 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 505 Write 301 Mixed 389 SusWrite 169 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 37.3 134% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 69.1 DQ Mixed 57.7 65% 115 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB 3,125 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 36 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 27 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 37.2 86% 29.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 57: 0P 5R 10G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
57%	68%	25	219	60	180	24"	1920 1080	ACR050E Acer XB241H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $140

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	5,262x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	3,460x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,685x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,737x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1,393x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	1,383x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,126x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	762x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	729x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	710x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	692x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	350x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $891

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16