MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '22 at 03:32
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 142
2-Core 260
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 899
86% 709 Pts
64-Core 1154
71% 1154 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2877 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 187
Parallax 179
141% 180 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 183
Splatting 125
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,806
Write 6194
Mixed 7,136
1,639% 7,379 MB/s
4K Read 547
4K Write 394
4K Mixed 108
1,176% 350 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 935
DQ Mixed 985
767% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Kingdian M280 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 140 140 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 510
Write 329
Mixed 399
SusWrite 171
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 40
140% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 69.5
DQ Mixed 57.6
65% 115 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 36.5
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 38.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $903
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback