MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 333%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics238% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive619% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory118.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 23:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 218
2-Core 432
124% 242 Pts
4-Core 843
8-Core 1,521
142% 1,182 Pts
64-Core 3,250
201% 3,250 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 117%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 13C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3195 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Lighting 338
Reflection 373
Parallax 424
275% 379 fps
MRender 481
Gravity 315
Splatting 231
267% 342 fps
Poor: 142%
This bench: 238%
Great: 244%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5098 5351 3937 3147 3148 3150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
619% Outstanding
Read 5,231
Write 5,239
Mixed 3,350
SusWrite 3,972
999% 4,448 MB/s
4K Read 72.6
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 100
326% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,720
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,484
1,107% 1,480 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 619%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
133% Outstanding
MC Read 51.9
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 49
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 47.1
SC Mixed 29
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 133%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 17.1" 1280 720 AUO41A2
Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback