Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '24 at 21:37
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8500T 5,135 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 511 58% 451 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (94^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (68 fps cap detected)	55.1% Above average	Lighting 68 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 63.9 55% 67.1 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 69 Splatting 64.2 54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$80 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 575GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 78 79 77 77 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 383 Write 88.7 Mixed 120 SusWrite 79.8 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 19.6 84% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 350 227% 262 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 128%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB 42 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 35GB free, PID 110c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 34.6 Mixed 20 SusWrite 32.3 41% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 74,390 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 34.4 MC Mixed 24.9 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 24.2 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	57	60	21.7"	1920 1080	GSM5AB9 LG FULL HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M S2H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,192x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	686x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	214x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	308x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	209x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	206x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	248x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	152x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	88x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	118x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	56x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16