Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H170-HD3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF (all builds)
Memory	17 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180309
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '24 at 15:50
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 76.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 208 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 573 59% 474 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme CT1000P 1TB 6,019 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 290GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 717 991 1066 264 84 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	157% Outstanding	Read 1,320 Write 1,182 Mixed 961 SusWrite 536 224% 1,000 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 47.7 155% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 651 DQ Write 401 DQ Mixed 274 272% 442 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 299%
Nvme KINGSTON SA2000M 1TB 1,543 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 536GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 641 625 512 507 463 507 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 1,110 Write 913 Mixed 126 SusWrite 543 149% 673 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 25.6 80% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 512 DQ Write 70 DQ Mixed 119 131% 234 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 301%
Toshiba MQ03ABB200 2TB 362 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 938GB free Firmware: JP050U SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 71 72 71 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 118 Write 110 Mixed 48 SusWrite 70.9 63% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 029E CMR16GX4M2C3600C18 859B CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR1 24GB 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	67	53	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170-HD3-CF

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	207x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	161x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $130Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	15x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	35x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	33x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $526

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16