HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 09:29
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 134
54% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 194
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 4.4
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Acer SA100 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 611
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 371
Write 343
Mixed 268
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 18.9
69% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 156
108% 134 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 93%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
395GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 93 89 93 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 96
Mixed 46.9
SusWrite 90.7
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G4M1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.4% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 13 60 18.5" 1280 720 HWP3334 Compaq B191
Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback