Acer Nitro N50-650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-650  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-650
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221209
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 23:42
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 212
2-Core 425
124% 240 Pts
4-Core 825
8-Core 1,360
133% 1,092 Pts
64-Core 2,244
139% 2,244 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Acer(1025 A731) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 114
Parallax 156
136% 146 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
122% 156 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 125%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
489GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 616 609 822 1342 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,619
Write 94.9
Mixed 589
SusWrite 640
161% 736 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 88.8
263% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1,420
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 994
777% 1,086 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 238%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S1MF-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 32.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 40.4
SC Mixed 26.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 2048 1081 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Nitro N50-650 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

System: Acer Nitro N50-650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback