HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 17:27
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 83
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 809
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
HP(103C 8554) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 107
Parallax 120
98% 116 fps
MRender 162
Gravity 115
Splatting 96.6
99% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1110 770 792 826 821 787 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,624
Write 1,881
Mixed 1,630
SusWrite 851
337% 1,496 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 55.8
178% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 788
DQ Mixed 930
702% 948 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 215%
Great: 472%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
393GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 148 136 143 143 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 155
Write 164
Mixed 90.6
SusWrite 140
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
577GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 153 158 155 153 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 120
Write 157
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 154
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 106%
WD My Passport 2603 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2603
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 36.8
50% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 32GB
2133, 2667, 2133, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 18.7
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 144 27" 1920 1017 MSI3FA6 MSI MAG271C
Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,964 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback