HP 350 G2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 350 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 803A
Memory7.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 11:31
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 92.3
43% 69.4 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 120
16% 117 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 803A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 384
Write 330
Mixed 346
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 24
81% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 121
99% 145 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP687515-H66-MCN 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 28 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO43EC
Typical 350 G2 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 350 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback