Medion P66078

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion P66078  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 04:53
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 608
69% 538 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 3802) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.9% Below average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 45.7
42% 50.5 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 46.7
Splatting 42.6
35% 42.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW512HMJP-00000 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12A1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 736
Write 156
Mixed 201
78% 364 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 13.1
75% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 158
119% 161 MB/s
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
4GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 102
Mixed 125
48% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 25.4
4K Mixed 17.6
70% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 118
108% 174 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
328GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 115 112 112 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 167
Write 165
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 114
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U16G-2666 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 34
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 30.1
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 49: 0P 5R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
49% 23% 73 190 11 75 23.8" 1280 720 HWV2402 HUAWEI AD80HW
Typical P66078 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion P66078

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback