TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 04:24
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 57.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 292
86% 166 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 759
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 76.9%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 153A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3758
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.5% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 149
Parallax 106
94% 123 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 89.8
Splatting 81.3
81% 101 fps
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 89.5%
 Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 115 117 118 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 120
Write 629
Mixed 118
SusWrite 113
56% 245 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 10.8
38% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 86
65% 87.2 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑
This bench: 27.3%
 Great: 253%
Nvme PM951 SAMSUNG 256GB
31GB free
Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 301 302 304 290 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 875
Write 309
Mixed 359
SusWrite 299
101% 460 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 38.8
188% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 431
374% 572 MB/s
Poor: 92% ↑
This bench: 138%
 Great: 147%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FP 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 14% ↑
This bench: 32.7%
 Great: 45%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

CPU
Core i5-11400HIntelBench 80%, 35,470 samples9,390x
Core i7-11800HIntelBench 88%, 56,029 samples5,227x
Core i9-11900HIntelBench 89%, 6,494 samples569x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 25,082 samples5,214x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 7%, 53,008 samples3,045x
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples1,830x
SSD
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1114 512GBNvmeBench 186%, 8,325 samples4,159x
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GBNvmeBench 244%, 4,593 samples3,789x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBNvmeBench 158%, 2,168 samples1,214x
RAM
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 38,732 samples2,922x
M471A1K43EB1-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 14,450 samples2,208x
M471A2K43EB1-CWE 1x16GBSamsungBench 46%, 7,758 samples832x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback