HP EliteBook 745 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83D5
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 03 '24 at 23:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 126
47% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 345
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics
HP(103C 83D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.16.03
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pc401 NVMe SK hynix 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80003E00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 655 599 597 608 610 611 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 1,026
Write 1,002
Mixed 1,076
SusWrite 613
209% 929 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 43.5
132% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 522
382% 505 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 142%
Great: 215%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6D1 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.1% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 23.6
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 18
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 24 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14E0
Typical EliteBook 745 G5 Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback