Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10 Plus (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ProLiant ML30 Gen10 Plus
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230720
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '24 at 20:50
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2314 26 User benchmarks, average bench 60% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 97 2-Core 219 68% 126 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 311 42% 313 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 83%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 10 Volume 3.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 3.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 121 64 81 118 124 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	105% Outstanding	Read 1,209 Write 381 Mixed 402 SusWrite 127 115% 530 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 23.2 77% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 586 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 508 398% 549 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965745-039.A00G 2x31.5GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 29.8 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 157%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	4	60	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16