Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro SYS-1029U-TRT (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X11DPU
Memory	19.2 GB free of 192 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 2278 x 1272 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '23 at 18:00
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4215R 42 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 60.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 211 67% 125 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 779 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 1,960 121% 1,960 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 270 263 269 282 279 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 921 Write 342 Mixed 311 SusWrite 272 101% 461 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 22.3 75% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 328 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 262 197% 267 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 184%
Intel Raid 10 Volume 3.5TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 2.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 470 460 467 491 488 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	102% Outstanding	Read 834 Write 647 Mixed 485 SusWrite 474 136% 610 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 24.6 84% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 274 217% 304 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 9ASF2G72PZ-3G2F1 12x16GB 12 of 24 slots used 192GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.4% Good	MC Read 22.4 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 24.2 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	32	23	0	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16