ECT One Computer AMD FX-6100, 6x 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT One Computer AMD FX-6100, 6x 3  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '24 at 19:47
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 73
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 168
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 492
49% 398 Pts
64-Core 731
45% 731 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 139
Parallax 159
136% 155 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 136
Splatting 101
121% 156 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 125%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T450-2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.Y.J.JK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1425 1567 1665 1795 1760 1779 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,424
Write 1,888
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 1,665
370% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 57.3
180% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 742
534% 694 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 245%
Great: 556%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
313GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 122 125 123 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 156
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 123
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.M8FF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 28
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 24.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 30 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC0C8 PHL 274E5
Typical One Computer AMD FX-6100, 6x 3 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-6100, 6x 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback