HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '24 at 19:43
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31260L 310 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 80.8 1-Core 63 2-Core 130 56% 91.1 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 290 31% 247 Pts	64-Core 295 18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.1 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 18.8 15% 18.4 fps	MRender 15.5 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 17.4 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate 600 480GB-$199 1,254 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: C675 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 321 357 372 379 379 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 369 Write 320 Mixed 347 SusWrite 316 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 36.2 4K Mixed 19 74% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 252 200% 279 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 104%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 209GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 119 119 120 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 76.5 SusWrite 116 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5402-455.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 99U5402-455.A00LF Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.3% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 13.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	44.9"	1280 720	GSM9CFE 47LG5000

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,671x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	553x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	546x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	275x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	239x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	124x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	54x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16