ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 90H3000SPT

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90H3000SPT (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36D5
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '18 at 22:40
Run Duration	448 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 132 2-Core 257 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 700 70% 570 Pts	64-Core 702 44% 702 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.2% Very good	Lighting 97.9 Reflection 112 Parallax 90.2 80% 99.9 fps	MRender 93 Gravity 93.1 Splatting 98.9 78% 95 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TB8U256G1001 256GB 4,613 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4133101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 58 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 51 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 16 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 100 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 44 188980199459 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 16704545 (EA) Unknown 100 100 630 (F1) Unknown 253 253 607 (F2) Unknown 253 253 413 (F9) Unknown 100 100 459	89.5% Excellent	Read 487 Write 386 Mixed 324 88% 399 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 98.9 4K Mixed 17.1 126% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 14.9 72% 161 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 907GB free Firmware: CC63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 66 53648176 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 85 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 298633 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 58 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 48 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 65 588840995 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 85 (C2) HDA temperature 35 21 90194313251 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 5 4 53648176 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 66438849101875 (F1) Unknown 100 253 193606872 (F2) Unknown 100 253 115904704	91.3% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 161 Mixed 133 113% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.29 104% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 112%
USB 2.0 SD/MMC Reader 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6d00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.98% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 9.74 10% 9.64 MB/s	4K Read 5.23 4K Write 0.25 4K Mixed 0.06 30% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.98% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 13.2 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.5 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback